As part of GCSE revision, Daniel is completing maths practice papers. Great I thought until I came to mark them and found that even the answer sheet is testing. Would be fine if he got them all right, but when he doesn’t, we both try to decipher the step by step answers and still don’t have a clue.
So the answer book says if you find this hard going, take a look at Circle Geometry. Ah ha, I thought and I did. It told me that:
- Tangent-Radius meets at 90°
- Angles in the same sequent are equal
- Chord Bisector is a Diameter
Whilst I remember the mnemonic from school comparing two classmates to Radius and Diameter (little Redman, big Davey), the rest is a mystery.
So I studied the answer book. I studied the revision guide. And I studied the question again. Can I prove that the angle CAB = BCD? Not a chance.
Daniel: Well?
Me: How about some English?
Me: How about some English?
Still at least they have revision guides now. And they’re beautiful things. Lots of colours, graphics, summaries after every section and as easy to read as a comic. A million years apart from our dry textbooks or paltry notes we took during lessons. When they question annually why exam results are improving, I think they should look at the revision tools.
Best thing of all though, was The Now Show (thank you Radio 4). It asked the audience for the signs of Spring and a teacher replied that All 16 year olds Are Doing At Least 4 Hours Revision Per Day. At Least. And Not Including Breaks. Made us all laugh, but it revised my expectations.
So is Daniel doing 4 hours revision per day? Probably not, but it feels like I am.